{"id":294,"date":"2018-05-16T14:00:11","date_gmt":"2018-05-16T19:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/?page_id=294"},"modified":"2024-04-24T10:19:21","modified_gmt":"2024-04-24T15:19:21","slug":"ctas-implementation-guidelines","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/?page_id=294","title":{"rendered":"Publications"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wpb-content-wrapper\"><p>[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h3>2016 Revised CTAS Guideline<\/h3>\n<p><em>The 2016 revisions have added 3 new CEDIS complaints, integrated components of the Obstetrical Triage and Acuity Scale (OTAS) to align our obstetrical special modifiers where possible, and added a postpartum complaint. The need to identify and adjust to the challenges of the increasing aging demographic has led to the publication of a separate review on applying CTAS to the geriatric population.<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>English 2016 Version: CJEM 2017;19(S2):S18-S27 (<span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1017\/cem.2017.365\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Direct<\/a> <\/span>or <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/revisions_to_the_canadian_emergency_department_triage_and_acuity_scale_ctas_guidelines_2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a><\/span>)<\/li>\n<li>English Applying CTAS to Geriatric Patients 2016 Version: CJEM 2017;19(S2):S28-S37 (<span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1017\/cem.2017.363\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Direct<\/a> <\/span>or <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/guidance_when_applying_the_canadian_triage_and_acuity_scale_ctas_to_the_geriatric_patient_executive_summary.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a><\/span>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h3>2013 Revised CTAS Guideline<\/h3>\n<p><em>Key updates in this revision include messaging around the recognition that ED overcrowding both increases the need for effective triage, but can also add pressure to triage nurse acuity assignments. The ideal is to \u2018stream\u2019 patients to the most appropriate treatment space and not to the waiting room. Adult fever is now defined as &gt;38<sup>o<\/sup>C to align with the SIRS criteria definition. For Paeds pulse and respiratory rate assessments, new 0-2 years graphs have been developed for easier interpretation. Newly born was added as a presenting complaint for babies born in or on the way to the ED. Button battery\u00a0modifiers have been added to several foreign body complaints.<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>English 2013 Version: CJEM 2024;16(6):485-9 (<span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/ctas_guidelines_-_2014.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a><\/span>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h3>2008 Revised Paediatric CTAS Implementation Guideline<\/h3>\n<p><em>Since the original Paeds CTAS Implementation Guideline published in 2001, a standardized CEDIS complaint list was published. A revised CEDIS version in 2008 was published to be more inclusive of the diversity of adult and paediatric presentations and the paediatric complaints were included in the system based list rather than separated. The new implementation guideline clarifies the similarity of the process for adult and paediatric triage while recognizing some of the unique aspects of children\u2019s presentations.<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>English 2008 Version: CJEM 2008;10(3):224-232 (<a href=\"https:\/\/caep.ca\/periodicals\/Volume_10_Issue_3\/Vol_10_Issue_3_Page_224_-_232_Warren.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">PDF<\/span><\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>French 2008 Version: CJEM 2008;10(3):233-243 (<a href=\"https:\/\/caep.ca\/periodicals\/Volume_10_Issue_3\/Vol_10_Issue_3_Page_233_-_243_Warren.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">PDF<\/span><\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>2008 Revised Adult CTAS Implementation Guideline<\/h3>\n<p><em>In conjunction with the 2008 CEDIS presenting complaint list revisions, the Adult CTAS Guideline has been revised. To understand the current content and implementation of adult CTAS, readers need to include the 2004 guideline revisions as the 2008 manuscript only identifies modifications to the 2004 paper, but does not repeat any of the content that is unchanged.<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>English 2008 Version: CJEM 2008;10(2):136-142 (<a href=\"https:\/\/caep.ca\/periodicals\/Volume_10_Issue_2\/Vol_10_Issue_2_Page_136_-_142_Bullard.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">PDF<\/span><\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>French 2008 Version: CJEM 2008;10(2):143-150 (<a href=\"https:\/\/caep.ca\/periodicals\/Volume_10_Issue_2\/Vol_10_Issue_2_Page_143_-_150_Bullard.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">PDF<\/span><\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h3>2004 Revised Adult CTAS Implementation Guideline<\/h3>\n<p><em>Following the publication of the CEDIS presenting complaint list in 2003 and experimentation with CTAS electronic decision support, the adult guidelines were revised to combine the complaints and standardized CTAS modifiers in a format compatible with computerization.<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>English 2004 Version: CJEM 2004;6(6):421-7 (<span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/2004_revisions-to-the-canadian-emergency-department-triage-and-acuity-scale-implementation-guidelines.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a><\/span>)<\/li>\n<li>French 2004 Version CJEM 2005;7(1):28-35 (<span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/caep.ca\/periodicals\/Volume_7_Issue_1\/Vol_7_Issue_1_Page_28_-_35_Murray.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a><\/span>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h3>2001 Paediatric Implementation Guideline<\/h3>\n<p><em>Recognizing the special challenges that the assessment of children poses, CAEP, NENA, and AMUQ combined with the CPS to develop the first Paediatric specific guidelines.<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>English 2001 Version: CJEM 2001;3(4) (<span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/paedctas.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a><\/span>)<\/li>\n<li>French 2001 Version: CJEM 2001;3(4) (<a href=\"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/PAed-CTAS-2001_Intro_French.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">PDF<\/span><\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h3>1998 CTAS Implementation Guidelines<\/h3>\n<p><em>The original guidelines developed by members of CAEP, NENA, and AMUQ were the first 5-level triage scale introduced in North America and became the recognized national standard.<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>English 1998 Version (<span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/ctased16_98.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a><\/span>)<\/li>\n<li>French 1998 Version (<span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/etg_98.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a><\/span>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text] 2016 Revised CTAS Guideline The 2016 revisions have added 3 new CEDIS complaints, integrated components of the Obstetrical Triage and Acuity Scale (OTAS) to align our obstetrical special modifiers where possible, and added a postpartum complaint. The need to identify and adjust to the challenges of the increasing aging demographic has led to the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"parent":119,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-294","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/294","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=294"}],"version-history":[{"count":40,"href":"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/294\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":943,"href":"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/294\/revisions\/943"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/119"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ctas-phctas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=294"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}